Engineering teams can't easily quantify the risk of specific modules/services (how likely they are to cause outages or expensive rework), nor can they prove that a refactor or automation actually reduced that risk. This means proactive work that reduces future incidents is invisible during reviews and roadmap prioritization.
Why now: SRE best practices and telemetry are maturing; teams demand tools that translate observability into business-risk metrics to justify technical work and prioritize refactors.
A service-level risk-scoring engine that blends telemetry (error rates, SLOs, incident frequency), code metrics (churn, test coverage, complexity), deployment friction (manual steps, rollback frequency), and ownership concentration to produce actionable risk scores per module. It tracks interventions (refactors, CI improvements, added tests) and models the counterfactual baseline to show measurable risk reduction and 'incidents averted' over time. Integrations with monitoring, SRE tools, and ticketing provide automated evidence for PMs and managers.
Built for: SRE leads, platform teams, and engineering managers responsible for reliability and technical debt across mid-to-large engineering organizations
Business model: subscription
Module Risk Scorer — 'Catastrophe Averted' Modeling targets a medium-sized market ($100M–$1B TAM). Existing solutions are incomplete or outdated — there's clear room for a better product.
Underserved
Medium
Startup (3 Months)
High
Unlock Full Analysis
Includes: 10 competitors found, 10 risks identified, full business plan, market research